Open end
An end opening aligned with the housing arrangement.
Confirm the locating diameter and sealing surfaces.

Explore a layered woven-wire structure for a defined particle-screening task. Compare the filtering weave, supports and complete flow path before selecting an assembly.
Every element is made to order. Typical values are shown for orientation; dimensions, rating and materials are confirmed in the quotation drawing.
Bonded mesh layers combine a filtration layer with support layers. Flat sheets can be formed into cylindrical elements, discs and other fitted components. Select the finished shape together with the housing connection, flow direction and cleaning method.


Confirm the selected dimensions, retention test and operating conditions before ordering. Ranges are not a single combined specification.


Start with the complete element and the task it must perform. You can discuss selection before every technical value is known.
This table lists the inputs needed from you. Element data are provided with the quotation; unknown input values can be left open.
Have only part of the information? Start with it; missing details can be clarified before a proposal.
Choose the relevant equipment guide to review its installation, normal flow path and application-specific inputs. Polymer-melt filtration also includes a separate metal-fiber candidate for comparison.
Compare the filter mounting, permitted powder carryover and cleaning loads at the product-retention stage.
Check the particle-removal task, steam conditions and condensate drainage at the point-of-use housing.
Connect melt viscosity and allowable pressure loss to the pleat pack and heated candle housing.
Alternative medium for comparison: Sintered metal fiber filter elements
Define the leaf drainage, screen support and cake-release cycle as one assembly.
On this page: closed-end outside-in candles with the bank isolated for reverse cleaning. This differs from double-open inside-out candles cleaned in sequence.
On this page: an outside-in supported-mesh bank during normal filtration; its cleaning circuit is not shown. Inside-out backwash vessels need a separate element and cleaning review.
Start with the application and the tradeoffs. You can request help before every operating value is known.
Define the filtering area, support and sealing interface together. The drawings below describe geometry, not an approved manufacturing design.
A tubular filtering surface with defined end details.
Check active length, diameters and the longitudinal seam.
A circular filtering surface for a defined seat.
Check diameter, thickness, edge treatment and support.
A flat filtering section for a drawing-defined assembly.
Check the working area, perimeter and support span.
A sound filtering layer cannot compensate for a leaking end seal. Review seams, end-cap joints, support contact and the housing seal as one assembly.
Specify where the released solids will go, how the element is isolated and how reverse differential pressure is limited. A cleanable medium does not by itself create an effective cleaning cycle.
A hard particle challenge may not represent gels or deformable agglomerates. Include representative samples or a description of their behavior when agreeing a retention test.
An end opening aligned with the housing arrangement.
Confirm the locating diameter and sealing surfaces.
A thread-defined connection to the mating component.
Specify thread standard, size, engagement and seal.
A flange-defined mounting and sealing interface.
Provide bolt pattern, mating face and gasket details.
The table explains what to define for selection. It is a requirements worksheet, with product ratings and supply options still to be confirmed.
Scroll the table sideways to read all specification columns.
| Parameter / unit | What it means | What to specify |
|---|---|---|
| Wetted materialsalloy designation | The medium, support, fittings and weld materials may have different exposure limits. | Fluid composition, concentration, temperature and cleaning chemistry. |
| Particle retentionµm + efficiency | An opening size and a tested retention rating describe different information. | Target particle size, required removal efficiency and test method. |
| Weave and layer constructionconstruction drawing | Mesh count does not identify wire size, weave or layer function. | Filtering weave, layer sequence and the original specification if replacing an element. |
| Design flow and fluid viscositym³/h; mPa·s | The same element has different pressure loss in water, oil and a viscous process liquid. | Normal and peak flow; viscosity at the operating and cold-start temperatures. |
| Effective filtration aream² | Area blocked by joints or supports does not contribute equally to flow. | Housing envelope, element quantity and usable media area. |
| Clean and terminal pressure dropkPa or bar | The clean hydraulic loss, change-out limit and mechanical limit are separate values. | Clean pressure-drop allowance and maximum operating differential pressure. |
| Reverse-flow applicationkPa or bar | Backwash reverses the load on the medium, joints and seals. | Backwash medium, direction, pressure sequence and cycle frequency. |
| Temperature cycle°C | Continuous operation and short cleaning cycles create different conditions. | Minimum, normal and peak temperature; heating and cooling sequence. |
| Dimensions and sealingmm; drawing revision | Fit includes the sealing face and mating connection, not only overall length. | Dimensioned drawing, tolerances, flow arrow and connection standard. |
A material name or micron value alone is not a complete specification. Pressure, temperature and cleaning limits apply to the assembled element.
Mesh count is not a complete pore specification. Wire diameter and weave define the passages; a Dutch weave has a different passage geometry from an open square weave. Compare the stated geometric measurement with particle-removal evidence, especially for elongated or deformable particles.
The fine filtering layer and the structural support do different jobs. Layer order, support contact and flow direction influence the working flow path. Assess forward filtration and any reverse-cleaning load for the complete bonded assembly; system pressure does not establish its differential-pressure limit.
Geometric area can include portions blocked by supports, end fittings or deposits. Compare clean pressure loss at the same fluid viscosity and flow, then check whether cleaning reaches retained solids. A successful water rinse does not establish compatibility with a different solvent or cleaning cycle.
A layer count does not define retention or assembly strength. Record the filtering weave separately from drainage and support layers, then agree the finished element's acceptance criteria.
On a small screen, scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Parameter | How to specify and compare | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Particle retention | State size, efficiency and nominal/absolute definition. | Challenge particles, test method and revision. |
| Layer construction | Define weave, wire diameter and thickness under stated load. Bulk density is mass/bulk volume; porosity is void fraction. | Layer drawing and measurement basis. |
| Bubble point | Pressure at bubble onset: match wetting liquid and temperature; it is not particle-retention efficiency. | Test conditions and result. |
| Air permeability | State flow per exposed area and specimen pressure difference. | Air-test pressure, temperature and specimen thickness. |
| Finished assembly | Specify alloy, seams, support and seals; media tests do not rate the assembly. | Controlled drawing and pressure/compatibility evidence. |
Reference air tests use 200 Pa for fiber felt and 1000 Pa for mesh. Confirm the specimen pressure difference before comparing them; these test pressures are not operating limits. Unit conversion: 1 L/(dm²·min) = 6 m³/(m²·h).
Liquid capacity also depends on viscosity, temperature and effective area. For pleated elements, specify pleat height, spacing and blocked areas; envelope area alone is insufficient.
Structure determines how fluid travels through the medium and where particles are retained.
Wire diameter and weave define mesh openings. Square and Dutch weaves create different flow paths; mesh count alone does not describe retention. Compare the actual filtering layers.
A sintered laminate bonds adjacent woven layers into a supported structure. The filtering layer, protection mesh and drainage or support layers perform different jobs. Their arrangement must follow the specified flow direction.
Particles can accumulate at the filtering surface and form a cake. The clean element pressure drop is only the starting condition; selection also needs the allowable loaded pressure drop and a practical path for removing the retained solids.
Select an industry to see the process conditions and performance criteria used to specify this filter medium.
A mesh barrier is a candidate where particles can obstruct a downstream nozzle or passage. The useful target comes from that equipment, not from choosing the smallest catalog micron rating. Debris loading and particle shape affect how quickly the upstream surface blocks; a larger working area or upstream separation may matter more than a finer layer.
Compare fit, downstream particle quality and pressure rise at known flow; record recovery after the intended cleaning.
This is a selection scenario. Equipment approvals, flow capacity and cleaning recovery are confirmed for each project.
In process liquids or melts, the weave and support stack form a flow path as well as a particle barrier. Hard contaminants and deformable gels can behave differently. For viscous melts, a tighter passage can increase resistance and change local flow; nominally similar screens need comparison at the same temperature, throughput and contaminant challenge.
Assess product quality and pressure rise together; include startup and the proposed screen-changing or cleaning method.
A mesh assembly is not automatically an equivalent polymer screen pack. Compatibility and allowable loads remain project-specific.
For upstream particle removal, identify whether the contaminants are hard solids, soft agglomerates or fibers. A geometric opening does not fully describe passage of deformable or elongated material. Locate this stage in the process and define the downstream quality requirement; product-contact construction and cleaning must be evaluated separately from particle screening.
Review representative particle results, assembly integrity and a documented cleaning assessment for the intended application.
No sterile-filtration claim is made. A medical-device OEM component requires a separate device-specific design and validation route.
A mesh element can be evaluated as a surface barrier against rust or other solid debris ahead of a protected component. In a gas service, the actual volume at the element controls the hydraulic question; reference-volume flow must be stated with its reference conditions. A wet stream changes the task and can alter the available flow path.
Review retention and pressure loss at representative conditions, along with seal and connection integrity.
A particle screen does not establish coalescing, vapor removal, sour-service or pressure-equipment approval.
On a small screen, scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Model | Nominal rating, µm | Absolute rating (98 %), µm | Bubble point, Pa | Air permeability at 1000 Pa, L/(dm²·min), ≥ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YS-SM5-001 | 1 | 6–7 | 5500–6500 | — |
| YS-SM5-002 | 2 | 8–9 | 4000–5000 | — |
| YS-SM5-005 | 5 | 11–14 | 3500–5000 | 200 |
| YS-SM5-010 | 10 | 16–18 | 2900–3800 | 250 |
| YS-SM5-015 | 15 | 24–26 | 2400–3300 | 320 |
| YS-SM5-020 | 20 | 28–32 | 1500–2400 | 450 |
| YS-SM5-025 | 25 | 34–36 | 1150–2000 | — |
| YS-SM5-030 | 30 | 40–45 | 800–1800 | 550 |
| YS-SM5-040 | 40 | 50–63 | 1000–1300 | 650 |
| YS-SM5-050 | 50 | 71–80 | 600–1050 | 750 |
| YS-SM5-070 | 70 | 86–95 | 650–1030 | 900 |
| YS-SM5-100 | 100 | 110–120 | 550–900 | 950 |
Bubble point: ISO 4003-type test; reference range compiled from tests with different wetting liquids (test liquid confirmed per order). Air permeability: ISO 4022-type test at 1000 Pa; “—” = no reference value published, confirmed per order. 1 L/(dm²·min) = 6 m³/(m²·h).
Reference values only; final specifications are confirmed for each custom order.
On a small screen, scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Model | Construction | Thickness, mm | Areal mass, kg/m² | Porosity, % | Tensile strength, MPa | Rating range, µm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YS-SM5 | Protective + filter + 3 support layers (5 layers) | 1.7 | 8.4 | ≈38 | ≈115 | 1–200 |
| YS-SM6 | Five-layer laminate + coarse support mesh (6 layers) | 3.5 | 14.4 | ≈48 | ≈68 | 1–200 |
| YS-SMP | Mesh laminate sintered to perforated plate | ≤ 10 | by design | — | by design | by design |
Porosity calculated from areal mass and thickness; tensile strength converted from kgf/mm² (1 kgf/mm² = 9.807 MPa). Standard sheet up to 1000 × 1200 mm. Other layer counts on request. Standard materials AISI 304, 316L; 904L, 2205, Alloy C-276 and Alloy 400 on request.
Reference values only; final specifications are confirmed for each custom order.
On a small screen, scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Form (model) | Typical dimensions | Rating, µm | Media temperature range | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cylindrical element (YS-SME) | OD 10–300 mm; L 20–1200 mm | 1–300 | −200…+480 °C (316L, air) | Working ΔP up to 0.6 MPa (reference; depends on diameter, wall and support core); thread, flange, 222/226 socket, tie-rod |
| Disc / cone / sheet part (YS-SMD) | Ø 10–1000 mm; sheet up to 1000 × 1200 mm | 1–200 | −200…+480 °C (316L, air) | Welded rim or frame |
| Filter-dryer / Nutsche disc (YS-FD) | Ø 100–3000 mm; 1.7 / 2.5 / 3.5 / 6 / 8 mm | 1–200 | −200…+480 °C (316L, air) | Multilayer mesh, welded flange ring |
| Fluidizing / aeration plate (YS-SMF) | Up to 1200 × 1000 mm | by design | −200…+480 °C (316L, air) | Gas distribution, powder handling |
| Backwash cartridge, perforated composite (YS-SMP-B) | by design | by design | by project | Outside-in flow, reverse flushing |
Temperatures are limits of the filter medium. The limit of an assembled element is set by its seals, gaskets and joints (elastomer O-rings in 222/226 sockets are much lower) and is confirmed per order. Higher temperatures with other alloys on request.
Reference values only; final specifications are confirmed for each custom order.
Use these checks to compare the filtering layer and complete assembly before requesting a proposal.
Separate weave or opening size from tested particle retention so the requested mesh rating has a clear acceptance basis.
Check usable area, fluid viscosity and clean versus loaded pressure loss before comparing element geometries.
Review cleaning access, reverse loading and the compatibility of the medium, joints and seals as one assembly.
No. Layer count describes construction. Retention depends on the filtering weave and its verified performance; the other layers may provide protection, drainage or support.
A photograph helps identify the form. A replacement inquiry also needs the sealing dimensions, flow direction, original retention requirement and operating differential pressure.
Pleating can place more media inside an envelope, but usable flow area depends on pleat spacing, supports and solids loading. Compare the complete element and its cleaning access, rather than geometric area alone.
A drawing or short process brief is enough to begin. Add the details you already know; missing values can be clarified during review.
Inquiry contextSintered wire mesh filter elements
Useful if available — optional for your first inquiry:
Use the full inquiry form to attach a drawing or file. The short form alongside accepts your message.
Your reference is:
Thank you. Your enquiry has been received.